The appellants appealed a trial judgment awarding the respondents $485,000 for economic loss.
The appellants argued they were denied a fair trial due to a lengthy delay in the delivery of the judgment, that the trial judge's reasons were insufficient for appellate review, and that the trial judge erred in the standard of proof for calculating lost business profits.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no active prejudice from the delay, sufficient evidence to support the trial judge's conclusions, and no error in the estimation of economic loss based on the evidence presented.
