The plaintiff brought a motion for summary judgment based on a fraudulent overbilling scheme, and the defendant brought a cross-motion for production of financial records referred to in the plaintiff's forensic accounting report.
The court granted summary judgment to the plaintiff on liability, as the defendant admitted to participating in the scheme.
However, the court granted the defendant's motion for document production, finding the records relevant to the defendant's argument that the plaintiff suffered no actual loss because the losses were covered by other over-inflated invoices.
