The applicant moved for a parenting time order, a refraining order against the Family Responsibility Office (FRO) regarding driver's license suspension, and a retroactive variation of child support.
The motion was opposed by the respondent and FRO.
The court dismissed the motion, finding no authority to remove FRO, that the applicant failed to meet procedural conditions for a refraining order (e.g., filing a sworn financial statement, bringing a proper Motion to Change), and failed to demonstrate a material change in circumstances or "clean hands" for the support variation.
The parenting time request was dismissed without prejudice, allowing the applicant to provide further evidence of required counselling.
