The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.
The respondent initially placed the applicant in the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG) but later removed him due to psychological injuries.
The respondent denied four physical treatment plans.
The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide proper medical and other reasons for denying three of the treatment plans after the applicant was removed from the MIG, making them payable.
The fourth treatment plan was denied as the applicant's accident-related injuries had resolved and ongoing pain was likely due to pre-existing diabetes.
The applicant was also awarded interest on overdue payments.
