This trial judgment addresses various family law issues following a marital separation, including spousal and child support, the valuation of a corporate interest, and an oppression remedy claim.
The court found the respondent's financial disclosure and credibility severely lacking, leading to adverse inferences regarding his income.
The respondent's income for support purposes was imputed by disregarding corporate losses that primarily served his personal lifestyle.
The applicant's claim for an oppression remedy was dismissed on procedural grounds due to prior partial minutes of settlement that did not list it as an outstanding issue.
