The respondent father sought an interim order to vary the access provisions of a final order due to criminal charges laid against him, including sexual assault and sexual interference involving children.
The applicant mother opposed the father's proposed terms, advocating for stricter, professionally supervised access.
The court found a material and exceptional change in circumstances warranting an interim variation under its parens patriae jurisdiction.
Balancing the seriousness of the unproven allegations against the father's lack of prior record and the child's need for contact, the court ordered supervised access by the father's wife, S.M., with specific conditions, rejecting the mother's request for professional supervision due to cost and the availability of an approved supervisor.