The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, including a non-earner benefit and several medical and rehabilitation treatment plans.
The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet the burden of proving a complete inability to carry on a normal life, noting a lack of detailed evidence regarding pre- and post-accident activities.
The Tribunal also dismissed the claims for medical benefits, preferring the respondent's orthopaedic assessment over the applicant's treating chiropractor, and finding the applicant's evidence insufficient to establish that the treatments were reasonable and necessary.
The application was dismissed in its entirety, and the applicant's request for costs was denied.
