3 total
The court set aside a bankrupt's automatic discharge because the creditors' failure to file a formal notice of opposition was a matter of form rather than substance.
The creditors moved to set aside the automatic discharge of the bankrupt, Arash Nashid, which occurred despite their informal notice of opposition to the trustee.
The court found jurisdiction to set aside the discharge where there is injustice or an appearance of injustice.
Considering factors such as the timeliness of the creditors' informal notice, the trustee's prejudicial actions, the bankrupt's awareness of the opposition, the lawyer's inadvertence, lack of prejudice to the bankrupt, and prejudice to the creditors, the court granted the motion.
The automatic discharge was set aside, and the creditors were granted an extension to formally file their notice of opposition.
Motion granted allowing defendant to withdraw inadvertent admission of employment relationship in statement of defence.
The defendant, Coventry Connections Inc., brought a motion under Rule 51.05 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for leave to withdraw an admission in its statement of defence that the co-defendant taxi driver was its employee.
The plaintiff opposed the motion.
Applying the three-part test from Antipas v. Coroneos, the Master found that the admission was inadvertent and that its withdrawal would not result in any non-compensable prejudice to the plaintiff.
The motion was granted, allowing the defendant to amend its pleading to reflect the discovery evidence that the driver was an independent owner and operator.
Motion to set aside noting in default dismissed as moving party provided no explanation for delay.
The defendant brought a motion to set aside a noting in default and for leave to file a defence in an action for statutory accident benefits.
The defendant argued the plaintiff's claim was premature because mediation at the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) had not occurred.
The court found the mediation was deemed failed due to the expiration of the 60-day prescribed time limit, meaning the plaintiff's claim was not premature.
The court dismissed the motion to set aside the noting in default because the defendant provided no explanation for its delay in responding to the statement of claim and no evidence of an intent to defend.
