Stewart Title Guaranty Company, as a third party, brought a motion seeking an order to conduct invasive inspections of the plaintiffs' property to assess building deficiencies and repair costs.
The plaintiffs opposed, citing concerns about invasiveness and potential damage.
The court granted the motion under Rule 32.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, finding the inspection necessary for the proper determination of damages.
The court emphasized that Stewart Title's undertaking to restore the property to its previous condition alleviated the plaintiffs' concerns regarding potential damage from the invasive testing.
