The corporate plaintiff brought a motion for leave under Rule 15.01(2) to be represented by a non-lawyer agent, who was the son of the sole shareholder but held no official position in the corporation.
The defendants opposed the motion.
The court denied leave, finding that the proposed agent was not an officer, director, or shareholder, and allowing him to act would contravene the Law Society Act and Solicitors Act.
The court also noted concerns about his capability and the lack of personal financial consequences constraining his litigation decisions.
