2 total
Defence application to adduce third-party suspect evidence in a murder trial granted.
The accused, charged with first-degree murder, brought an application to adduce evidence of a third-party suspect.
The defence sought to call witnesses and introduce video surveillance to establish that another resident of the victim's building had animus, motive, and opportunity to commit the murder.
The court applied the McMillan test and found that the proposed evidence established a sufficient connection between the third party and the crime.
The application was granted, as the probative value of the evidence outweighed its slight prejudicial effect.
The court admitted the accused's statements to undercover officers, finding their probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect.
The Crown sought to admit utterances made by the accused, Najib Amin, during an undercover police operation in his first-degree murder trial.
The defence opposed admission, citing principles from R. v. Hart.
The court, applying the Hart factors as a framework, found the utterances admissible, concluding that their probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect and that police conduct did not constitute an abuse of process.
The ruling specifically addressed four categories of utterances, finding them all admissible with one requiring a specific instruction to mitigate prejudice.
