The accused was charged with multiple offences arising from a home invasion and robbery.
The Crown's case relied entirely on the recognition evidence of two victims who were familiar with the accused.
The court found the identification evidence unreliable due to discrepancies between the victims' trial testimony and their initial statements to police, as well as the brief time they had to observe the perpetrators.
Furthermore, an alibi witness raised a reasonable doubt as to the accused's whereabouts at the time of the robbery.
The accused was acquitted on all counts.