The applicant, an employee and son of the employer's co-owner, applied to terminate the respondent union's bargaining rights.
The union argued the statement of desire was involuntary due to the family relationship between the applicant, two other employee relatives, and the employer.
The Board found no evidence of employer interference or that the family relationship impaired the employees' ability to voluntarily express their true wishes.
The Board concluded the statement of desire was voluntary and directed a representation vote.
