The plaintiff brought a motion for summary judgment to enforce an alleged agreement to purchase Bitcoin from the defendants.
The plaintiff had wired $171,791 to the defendants, but no quote for the quantity and price of the cryptocurrency was ever provided or accepted, unlike in their previous transaction.
The court found that there was no enforceable contract because essential terms were missing.
The motion for summary judgment was dismissed, and the defendants were ordered to return the funds with interest based on unjust enrichment.
