A motion sought to add the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation as a party, or alternatively as an intervenor, to a request for directions brought by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission concerning document production obligations under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement.
The moving party argued that because the Commission’s mandate was nearing expiry, it might become responsible for receiving and archiving documents produced under any order.
The court held that the repository’s role under the settlement agreement was distinct from the Commission’s document‑collection mandate and that its presence was not necessary for the court to adjudicate the issues.
The court further held that the moving party had not demonstrated a direct interest or that its participation would enhance the court’s determination of the request for directions.
Both joinder and intervention were refused.
