The applicant physician brought a motion to stay a hearing before the hospital's Board of Directors regarding the termination of his hospital privileges, pending an application for judicial review.
The applicant alleged lack of notice and reasonable apprehension of bias.
The court found the applicant's case weak on the merits and that he would not suffer irreparable harm if the hearing proceeded.
The balance of convenience favoured continuing the hearing.
The motion for a stay was granted only to the extent that the Board was ordered not to disclose its decision until after the disposition of the judicial review application.
