The parties separated after a 20-year marriage.
The trial resolved issues of equalization, income determination, child and spousal support, and post-separation adjustments.
The court preferred the applicant's expert's asset-based valuation of the family businesses over the respondent's earnings-based approach.
The court imputed income to the respondent due to tax-free earnings from day trading losses.
The respondent was ordered to pay an equalization payment of $345,325.02 and significant retroactive child support.
The court also found the respondent engaged in serious misconduct by improperly accessing the applicant's privileged emails.
