The moving party sought to change a prior consent order requiring payment of child support based on imputed income.
The motion followed a prior unsuccessful motion to change, which had been dismissed without prejudice due to insufficient evidence of a material change in circumstances.
The court found that the present proceeding was effectively a rehearing of the earlier motion without new or materially different evidence.
The court also concluded that the moving party remained capable of earning the previously imputed income and had failed to provide sufficient financial or medical evidence to justify variation.
The motion to change was dismissed and costs were awarded to the responding party.
