The appellant appealed the dismissal of her claim for water damage to her property allegedly caused by the respondents, arguing the trial judge erred in credibility findings, was biased, and misapprehended evidence.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge's factual and credibility findings were well supported and there was no reasonable apprehension of bias.
The respondents' cross-appeal for substantial indemnity costs was also dismissed, as the trial judge's costs decision was entitled to deference.
