The appellant was injured in a motor vehicle accident and sought income replacement benefits.
The insurer terminated the benefits and subsequently requested neurological and psychological insurer's examinations after receiving new medical information from the appellant.
The appellant deliberately refused to attend the examinations, arguing they were unnecessary and unreasonable.
The Tribunal applied the Al-Shimasawi factors and found the insurer's requests were reasonably necessary.
Consequently, the Tribunal held that the appellant was barred under section 55(1)2 of the Schedule from proceeding with her appeal regarding the income replacement benefits.
