1 total
Deposit released on consent; preservation order denied for failure to serve the title holder.
The plaintiffs brought a motion for the release of a $100,000 deposit from an aborted real estate transaction and for a preservation order regarding the proceeds of sale of another property.
The self-represented defendant consented to the release of the deposit, which was granted.
The court dismissed the request for a preservation order because the defendant was not the title holder of the other property, and the actual title holder had not been served with the motion.
