The applicant sought an extension of time to file a motion for leave to appeal an interlocutory order that struck his pleadings for failing to comply with corporate disclosure obligations.
The court considered the factors for extending time under Rule 3.02 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
While the delay was short, the court found that the proposed appeal lacked merit and appeared to be a collateral attack on a prior consent order.
The motion for an extension of time was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the respondent.
