Diana Carrol v. Laura Canada and Donald Desabrais, 2016 HRTO 504

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

B E T W E E N:

Diana Carrol

Applicant

-and-

Laura Canada and Donald Desabrais

Respondents

INTERIM DECISION

Adjudicator: Jo-Anne Pickel Date: April 19, 2016 Citation: 2016 HRTO 504 Indexed as: Carrol v. Laura Canada

WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS

Diana Carrol, Applicant

Self-represented

1The background to this Application is set out in my previous Interim Decisions and in particular in Interim Decision 2016 HRTO 284.

2The applicant has advised the Tribunal that she has filed a proof of claim under the Re-Amended Plan of Compromise and Arrangement (“Plan”). This Plan was arrived at in the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act proceedings involving the corporate respondent. The Application is deferred pending the outcome of the proof of claim filed by the applicant.

3If the applicant wishes to re-activate her deferred Application following the outcome of her claim under the Re-Amended Plan of Compromise and Arrangement, she must make a Request for an Order During Proceedings in accordance with Rule 19 within 60 days after the determination of her claim under the Plan (Rules 14.3 and 14.4). If and when she seeks to re-activate her deferred Application, the Tribunal will determine appropriate next steps including the scheduling of a summary hearing in regards to her allegations against the personal respondent.

Order

4The Application is deferred pending the determination of the applicant’s claim under the Re-Amended Plan of Compromise and Arrangement.