HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Carol Prier
Applicant
-and-
Chrysler Canada
Respondent
DECISION
Adjudicator: Geneviève Debané
Indexed as: Prier v. Chrysler Canada
1This is an Application filed under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”). In Interim Decision 2012 HRTO 2116 issued November 7, 2012, the Tribunal deferred proceeding with this Application pending the conclusion of an ongoing grievance proceeding.
2On September 3, 2013 and October 24, 2012 the Tribunal wrote to the applicant. The applicant was asked to inform the Registrar on both occasions whether the other proceedings remained ongoing and, if possible, to indicate when they were expected to be completed.
3In a letter dated September 27, 2013, which was only received on October 25, 2013 the applicant wrote to the Tribunal advising that the other proceeding had concluded since the parties had entered into a Memorandum of Settlement in October 2012.
4The Tribunal has not received a Request to Reactivate the deferred Application.
Order
5In light of the fact that the grievance proceeding has been concluded for over one year and that no party sought to reactivate the Application within 60 days as required by the Tribunal’s Rules, the Application is dismissed.
Dated at Toronto, this 26th day of November, 2013.
“signed by”
Geneviève Debané
Vice-chair