The court reviewed the applicant mother's compliance with a temporary order for supervised access between the respondent father and their three children.
The court found that the mother failed to comply with the order by not redirecting the children's negative behaviour during virtual visits and by failing to require them to attend in-person supervised visits.
The court ordered that supervised access continue, with strict directions that the mother must facilitate the visits and discipline the children if they do not participate positively.
The eldest child's visits were ordered to be separate due to his negative influence on his siblings.
Costs of $21,000 were awarded to the respondent father.