The applicant father and respondent mother brought competing motions regarding supervised access, international travel with the children, and an advance on equalization.
Most issues were resolved on consent immediately prior to the hearing, while the court denied the father's request to travel to India and the mother's request for an equalization advance.
Both parties subsequently sought costs.
The court declined to award costs to either party, finding divided success and noting that the late resolution of issues did not justify a costs award.
