The plaintiff brought a motion seeking a consent order to reflect the settlement of an employment action against a self-represented former employee.
The draft judgment included a one-year non-competition clause that was not geographically limited and exceeded the relief sought in the statement of claim.
The court declined to sign the consent order, noting the lack of evidence regarding the reasonableness of the non-competition clause and the defendant's fiduciary status, but did so without prejudice to the plaintiff bringing another motion on a proper record.
