The defendants brought a motion to strike portions of the plaintiff's original and amended statements of claim, arguing that the human rights damages claim was defective and that amendments constituted a new cause of action barred by the Limitations Act.
The court found that the human rights claim was sufficiently pleaded and that it was not plain and obvious that the limitation period had expired for the human rights damages claim.
The court also declined to strike allegations of bad faith damages.
The motion was dismissed.
