The respondent mother sought an interim order to relocate with the child from Beeton to Pembroke, a 4.5-hour drive, to live with her new partner.
The applicant father opposed the move and sought expanded access, including overnights.
The court denied the mother's relocation motion, finding no pressing or compelling reasons and that the move was not in the child's best interests due to the significant impact on the father's access.
The court granted the father's motion for expanded unsupervised access, gradually increasing to alternating weekends with overnights.
