The defendant was charged with "Over 80" following a police investigation on April 10, 2016.
Police received dispatch information about a possible impaired driver and attended the registered address.
The investigating officer formed reasonable suspicion based on poor driving and a faint odour of alcohol, and made an approved screening device demand.
The defendant failed the ASD and was arrested.
The defendant brought a Charter application seeking exclusion of breath readings, alleging an unjustified delay of approximately seven minutes after arrest during which rights to counsel were not provided.
The Crown argued the delay was reasonable and explained.
The court found a breach of sections 8, 9, and 10(b) of the Charter on a balance of probabilities but determined that the applicant had not established a remedy pursuant to section 24(2) of the Charter.
The breath readings were admitted as evidence and the defendant was found guilty.