The applicant brought a motion to reopen the evidence of a July 2016 trial regarding spousal support, arguing that new evidence about the respondent's housing, increased income, and his own decreased income justified changing the support order.
The court applied the two-part test for admitting fresh evidence before a judgment is entered.
The court found that the new evidence either could have been discovered with reasonable diligence or would not have changed the outcome of the trial.
The motion was dismissed, and the original spousal support order was directed to be issued and enforced.
