Hayley E. Dilazzaro

The Applicant sought various orders, including intensive family reunification therapy for the children and the Respondent, a 90-day "black-out" period where children would reside with the Applicant without contact with the Respondent, and payment of therapy fees.

The court dismissed the requests for intensive therapy and the black-out period due to insufficient evidence on the nature of the therapy and the children's views, particularly given their ages.

The court ordered a division of outstanding and future Accendus Group fees between the parties, clarifying the scope of a previous order by Miller J. The Applicant's request for additional costs from a prior motion was dismissed.

The applicant brought a motion for the sale of the jointly owned matrimonial home, severance of the divorce, and related relief.

The respondent, who was incarcerated in Florida awaiting trial for assaulting the applicant, sought an adjournment due to communication difficulties with his counsel.

The court dismissed the adjournment request to avoid prejudicing the applicant's pending condominium purchase.

Applying the Partition Act, the court granted the order for sale, finding no evidence that the sale would prejudice the respondent's equalization payment.

The court ordered 50% of the net proceeds to be released to the applicant and the remaining 50% to be held in trust.

The motion to sever the divorce was dismissed without prejudice, and no costs were ordered.