2 total
Judicial review dismissed; officer's findings on credibility and durable solution in Armenia were reasonable.
The applicants, citizens of Syria, sought judicial review of a migration officer's decision refusing their applications for refugee status under the country of asylum class.
The officer concluded that the applicants had a durable solution in Armenia, were untruthful during their interviews, and provided falsified documents regarding their religious affiliation and ethnicity.
The Federal Court dismissed the applications, finding the officer's credibility and factual determinations to be reasonable.
Motion for a stay of removal dismissed; refusal of administrative deferral was reasonable.
The applicant sought a stay of his scheduled removal to Uganda, arguing that his presence was required to assist his wife in recovering from upcoming surgery.
The CBSA officer had previously denied an administrative deferral request on this basis, noting the presence of adult children who could assist.
The Federal Court denied the motion for a stay, finding that the applicant failed to show that the CBSA officer's decision refusing the deferral was unreasonable.
