The respondent brought a motion to compel the appellant to provide further and better answers to written examination for discovery questions.
The underlying appeal concerned whether the appellant's services constituted an exempt supply of a financial service or a taxable supply for GST/HST purposes.
The Tax Court of Canada granted the motion in part, ordering the appellant to provide factual bases for its legal positions and to make further inquiries of former employees regarding the services provided, while finding certain repetitive questions did not require further answers.
