2 total
Judicial review dismissed as RAD reasonably found refugee claimant not credible due to material inconsistencies.
The applicant, a citizen of Nigeria, sought judicial review of a decision by the Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) dismissing her appeal of a Refugee Protection Division (RPD) decision rejecting her claim for refugee protection on credibility grounds.
The applicant had provided inconsistent narratives regarding threats from her in-laws related to her husband's disappearance and failed to claim asylum during two extended stays in the United States.
The Federal Court found that the RAD reasonably concluded the applicant was not credible due to numerous material inconsistencies and omissions in her evidence.
The application for judicial review was dismissed.
Application for judicial review of RPD decision finding no credible basis for refugee claim dismissed.
The applicant, a 5-year-old child born in Brazil, applied for judicial review of an RPD decision rejecting his refugee protection claim for lacking a credible basis under s. 107(2) of the IRPA.
The applicant conceded the RPD's decision was reasonable, having provided no documentary evidence of persecution in Brazil and lacking credibility.
The Federal Court dismissed the application for judicial review.
