The applicant, a foreign-trained dentist, alleged that the respondent discriminated against him on the basis of place of origin by requiring graduates of non-accredited dental programs to undergo a more onerous certification process than graduates of accredited programs.
He also alleged that the requirement to write certification examinations in English disadvantaged him.
The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that the differential treatment was based on the accreditation status of the educational institution, not place of origin, and that the applicant failed to establish that the English language requirement disadvantaged him.
