The Respondent brought a motion seeking expanded parenting time, including a progression to a week-about schedule.
The Applicant opposed this, seeking continued supervised or monitored parenting time, citing a history of family violence and her role as the primary parent.
The court considered the best interests of the children under the Children's Law Reform Act, including the impact of family violence.
The court declined the Respondent's request for a drastic change to a week-about schedule but granted unsupervised and more expansive parenting time than previously ordered, while maintaining the Applicant as the primary parent.
The court also clarified that a previously signed Separation Agreement regarding financial issues remained in effect despite the Respondent's attempt to void it.
Costs were not awarded due to mixed success.
