The plaintiffs and the defendant Province brought cross-motions to compel answers to undertakings and refusals arising from examinations for discovery in an action concerning an assault on an inmate at a correctional facility.
The court ordered the Province to produce a redacted range plan, summaries of officer training and discipline, and an index of standing orders, balancing relevance with institutional security concerns.
The court dismissed the Province's motion to compel information about the plaintiff's brother's criminal and employment history, finding it irrelevant and disproportionate for assessing the plaintiff's hypothetical earning capacity.
