The respondent municipality gave notice of termination of a 1999 lease to the appellant soccer park corporation.
The respondent offered a new lease for the same property, but with a shorter term and a requirement that the appellant contribute to maintenance costs.
The 1999 lease required the respondent to provide another reasonably similar soccer facility at another location at its own expense upon termination.
The Court of Appeal held that the respondent failed to comply with these clear terms, rendering the termination invalid.
The appeal was allowed.
