The Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) brought four motions for summary judgment to recover approximately $632,000 owing on various mortgages, charges, lines of credit, and a credit card, and sought writs of possession.
The defendant, Albert Peter James Francoeur, advanced arguments characteristic of an Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument (OPCA) litigant, claiming to appear as "CEO" of "Freedom Trust RN 623 018 037 CA" and asserting that legal title had been transferred to the Department of Finance Canada.
The court found the defendant's arguments to be without merit and consistent with OPCA tactics as described in Meads v. Meads.
The motions for summary judgment were granted, the defendant's counterclaims were dismissed, and costs were awarded to RBC.
