The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings (RFOP) seeking to prospectively extend the one-year limitation period, amend her application to add new reprisal allegations, and obtain an interim remedy to establish ground rules for the respondents' conduct.
The Tribunal held that it cannot prospectively extend the limitation period under section 34 of the Human Rights Code, as good faith delay must be assessed on actual facts.
The request to amend was deferred because the main application was already deferred pending another matter.
Finally, the Tribunal denied the interim remedy, finding the applicant failed to meet the significant onus under Rule 23.2 to show that the balance of harm favoured the remedy or that it was necessary to ensure a complete remedy at the end of the hearing.
