2 total
The court dismissed the accused's application to sever 29 counts of robbery.
The accused brought an application to sever 29 counts of robbery (with various firearm and imitation firearm charges) spanning from 2010 to 2015 across multiple jurisdictions in Ontario.
The Crown sought to admit evidence on a count-to-count basis as similar fact evidence to prove identity.
The court applied the test from R. v. Last and examined nine factors relevant to severance.
Finding that the similar fact evidence application was viable and that all applicable factors supported a joint trial, the court dismissed the severance application.
A motion to approve a settlement for a party under disability was adjourned due to inadequate affidavit evidence regarding injuries and legal fees.
An application to approve a settlement for a plaintiff under disability, injured in a motor vehicle accident, was adjourned by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
The court found the submitted affidavits from the litigation guardian and solicitor to be inadequate, lacking sufficient detail regarding the plaintiff's injuries, their current status, and the justification for the proposed legal fees, particularly concerning any contingent fee arrangement.
The court emphasized its responsibility to ensure the settlement is in the best interests of the party under disability and that legal rights are not compromised without proper compensation, and that fees are justified.
Further affidavits were directed to address these deficiencies.
