The applicant sought an interim order for sole decision-making, reduced parenting time for the respondent, and child support.
The respondent opposed the changes, arguing the existing 2-2-3 shared parenting schedule, in place for three years, was in the children's best interests.
The court dismissed the applicant's motion, finding that the long-standing status quo was working well for the children, who were thriving academically and showed no negative impact from past parental conflicts.
The court also dismissed the child support claim without prejudice, noting insufficient submissions on the increased costs of shared parenting under the Federal Child Support Guidelines.
