The defendant, Terry Walman, brought a motion to strike the Statement of Claim against him, arguing it disclosed no reasonable cause of action.
The plaintiffs, mortgagors, had sued Walman, the mortgagee's lawyer, alleging breach of contract, improvident sale, and Charter violations related to a power of sale.
The court found that a lawyer owes no duty of care to opposing parties and that allegations of Walman being a 'controlling mind' were bald and unsupported.
Furthermore, Charter rights do not apply to private disputes.
The Statement of Claim was found to lack material facts for a recognized cause of action against Walman.
Leave to amend was denied due to the plaintiffs' failure to address deficiencies despite ample time.