The plaintiff was injured after slipping on ice on a municipal sidewalk after exiting a bus.
She sued the City of Toronto and the TTC, and later added the City's winter maintenance contractor, Pave-Tar.
Pave-Tar and the TTC brought motions for partial summary judgment to dismiss the claims against them.
Pave-Tar argued the claim against it was statute-barred, while the TTC argued it owed no duty of care.
The court dismissed both motions, finding a genuine issue for trial regarding the limitation period and concluding that partial summary judgment was inappropriate due to the intertwined facts and risk of inconsistent findings at trial.
