The appellant husband sought leave to appeal an interlocutory order requiring him to pay spousal support of $2,800 per month based on his 2011 income.
He argued the support should have been based on his projected 2012 income.
The court dismissed the motion for leave to appeal, finding no good reason to doubt the correctness of the interlocutory order and noting that appeals from interlocutory family matters are discouraged.
The court awarded costs of $5,000 to the respondent wife.
