The appellant sought leave to bring a motion to enforce an alleged settlement agreement, which was required under a previous court order.
The motion judge denied leave, finding the appellant had shown a flagrant and persistent disregard for prior court orders, including failing to give the respondent exclusive possession of four properties.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no basis to interfere with the motion judge's discretionary order, especially given conflicting evidence on whether a binding settlement agreement had been reached.
