The respondent sought leave to appeal a motion judge's decision adding two parties as applicants and declining to order the applicant to post security for costs in a will challenge proceeding.
The applicant brought a cross-motion for leave to appeal the motion judge's refusal to award costs.
The Divisional Court dismissed both motions, finding no conflicting decisions or good reason to doubt the correctness of the motion judge's substantive orders, and concluding that the costs decision did not raise an issue of sufficient importance to warrant leave to appeal.
