The appellant appealed his global sentence of 9 years for armed robbery of a bank, possession of a prohibited firearm, possession for the purpose of trafficking cocaine, and failure to comply with a youth sentence.
He argued the sentencing judge failed to consider his youth when imposing a consecutive sentence, failed to inquire into his ability to pay a restitution order, and erred in stating he possessed three guns instead of two.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the sentencing judge adequately considered the appellant's youth and ability to pay, and that the factual error regarding the number of guns did not affect the fitness of the global sentence.
