The applicant brought a constitutional application challenging the endorsement of a "Jenkins Caution" on the reverse side of his charging information for driving while under suspension.
The applicant argued that the endorsement violated his Charter rights under sections 7 and 11(d) by prejudicing the trier of fact regarding the existence of previous convictions and preventing him from receiving a fair and impartial trial.
The applicant sought a stay of proceedings.
The court dismissed the application, finding that the Jenkins Caution endorsement was an administrative pro-active measure documenting the prosecution's obligations and did not constitute a breach of Charter rights.
